Same-sex marriage hearings continue, Supreme Court weighs arguments on Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)

0 Comment Nation , , ,

31 photos

The Supreme Court on Wednesday concluded two hours of arguments about the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), a 1996 law that denies married same-sex couples access to federal benefits, reported Reuters. It is expected in June that the Court will release its decision. On Tuesday, the court heard arguments for and against California’s gay marriage ban Proposition 8.

Supreme Court indicates may strike down marriage law
Lawrence Hurley and David Ingram | Reuters
12:52 p.m. EDT, March 27, 2013

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Supreme Court justices on Wednesday indicated interest in striking down a law that denies federal benefits to legally married same-sex couples.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, a potential swing vote, warned of the “risks” that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) infringes upon the traditional role of the states in defining marriage.

The 1996 U.S. law denies married same-sex couples access to federal benefits.

Several justices raised concerns about the law, indicating there could be a narrow majority to strike it down.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stressed how important federal recognition is to any person who is legally married.

“It affects every area of life,” she said.

The law is the focus of a second day of oral arguments before the high court as it tackles the gay marriage issue.

Conservatives also criticized the decision by President Barack Obama to abandon the legal defense of DOMA and called into question his willingness to defend other laws passed by Congress and challenged in court, several conservative justices said.

“It’s very troubling,” Kennedy said.

While the criticisms may not affect how the justices eventually rule on whether the 1996 law violates U.S. equal protection rights, it showed frustration with how Obama has walked a difficult political line on gay marriage.

Obama and his attorney general, Eric Holder, said in February 2011 they would cease defending the law because they believed it to be invalid under the U.S. Constitution.

In the place of the U.S. Justice Department, Republican lawmakers have stepped in to argue for the law.

Chief Justice John Roberts pressed government lawyer Sri Srinivasan on how the government will now decide which laws to defend. “What is your test?” Roberts asked.

Srinivasan said he could not give the justices a “black or white” test. On the marriage law, the final decision rested with Obama, not with an official at a lower level, he said.

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley, David Ingram and Joseph Ax; Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Eric Beech)

RELATED: Editorial: Will the justices have more appetite to rule on DOMA than Proposition 8?